Why does Time think it's qualified to name the 100 best albums of all time? No idea, but they do.
Noted: No GNR, no Dark Side of the Moon.
posted by Rex at 5:18 PM on November 14, 2006
"...of All TIME," get it? Lots of hip-hop, but mainly pedestrian choices.
Plus putting that Hank Williams thing in the 2000s is definitely cheating.
posted by adm at 5:28 PM on November 14, 2006
Oh, and PJ Harvey's third-best album.
posted by Rex at 5:34 PM on November 14, 2006
These lists are designed for me to hate, so I'll stop and just point out something this made me realize: Springsteen's Born to Run came out a year before Stevie Wonder's Songs in the Key of Life. That just doesn't seem right, and yet it's true.
posted by Rex at 5:44 PM on November 14, 2006
another list bloated with 60's and 70's albums. (And similiar to PJ Harvey, the fourth best Stones album).
Shocked to see the stone roses - s/t on there.
posted by jesse at 7:44 PM on November 14, 2006
I suspect that Time phoned in this piece as a value add for Bose's advertising spend.
posted by Jimbo at 4:36 PM on November 15, 2006
NOTE: The commenting window has expired for this post.
Company Tumblr VYou Twitter Google+ Facebook Instagram Flickr Amazon Foursquare
A fimoculous is a micro-organism that consumes its own waste for sustenance.