The process of writing a feature story for
Wired is unlike anything else in publishing. Part of it is like a doctoral defense -- "rigorous" would be an understatement. Now a new blog,
Storyboard, chronicles that process of one upcoming story making it into the magazine.
Hi Samir. I've been a contributor at Wired for a couple years. I'm working on a feature pitch right now.
Story: Relationships 2.0
Tired or Wired?
Samir, remember: 'feeding on itself.' This is self promotion land here, remember? Now that I think about it, this organism might better be described as surviving by 'feeling up itself.'
Rock the Vote 2008: Sired.
Hi. Samir here. I know you've been doing pieces for Wired for a few years. That doesn't necessarily make you George Plimpton. I have a strong feeling that there are tasks and stories and processes that take place in the world of publishing that are quite a lot like your experience at Wired. I like the "feeling up itself" idea, though. Perhaps you could do a small redesign to include this?
Love,
Samir
Samir, I think maybe you should read the blog, and then maybe ask some people who write for other magazines for comparisons of processes. I talk to writers all the time, and they all note the rigorous process of writing for Wired. (I mean that in a good way.)
I don't know anyone who has gone through the process and not remarked on it.
Hyperbolically yours, George P.
I'm sorry, Rex. Samir here. I will read and enjoy the blog before commenting so frequently. I look forward to a lot more music posts. I like your taste in music.
Love,
Samir
The key difference between Rex and Samir is that Rex is focusing on what's different, and Samir on what's the same. I'm betting they're both right.