What cities Twitter the most? Sorry, NYC, but London, L.A., and Chicago are beating you.
Problem is, they glean that based on the 'Location' setting in Twitter. So if you have your Lat/Long in there, like many people with iPhones do, it doesn't count, to make no mention of people leaving it blank or putting something else in there for kicks.
posted by Nav at 3:24 PM on March 3, 2009
Other problem: based on total number, not percentage of population (and then, instead of giving the friggin number, they give a "grade"?!).
posted by alesh at 7:12 AM on March 4, 2009
Me sneaky Germans asks: Must NY not be on 1 (with Brooklyn on 21)?
posted by Thomas at 10:24 AM on March 4, 2009
I'm proud that Minneapolis beat Brooklyn. Now...where's Saint Paul?
posted by bryan kennedy at 11:00 AM on March 4, 2009
People in NY (especially Brooklyn) are proudly not Twittering. There is better stuff to do, wherever you are.
posted by Jason at 1:15 PM on March 4, 2009
The total number vs.percentage issue alesh points to makes this meaningless.
In related news, Los Angeles is dumb.
posted by mat at 2:20 PM on March 4, 2009
That should tell you something about Twitter, shouldn't it?
posted by laseetag at 9:28 PM on March 4, 2009
That's something NY should be proud of... I'm a Londoner and I'm ashamed that London is that high up.
God, don't people have jobs/more to do in their lives?
posted by Cliffdeford at 4:42 PM on March 10, 2009
NOTE: The commenting window has expired for this post.
Company Tumblr VYou Twitter Google+ Facebook Instagram Flickr Amazon Foursquare
A fimoculous is a micro-organism that consumes its own waste for sustenance.