You autocomplete me.
Redesigned: WSJ.com & Time.com. A race to boring. Update: Some WSJ.com reviews: Portfolio | PaidContent | Radar.
eeek, time.com is all sorts of wrong.
posted by ryan at 9:16 AM on September 16, 2008
let's make some picks. when will bigger news outlets figure out that a shitty website=losing money?
my pick: 08/01/09
posted by taylor at 10:49 AM on September 16, 2008
Awesome review, Rex.
posted by Karl Pearson-Cater at 11:05 AM on September 16, 2008
A mildly extended review: WSJ.com doesn't suck so bad. Time.com is a disaster.
(Because of Twitter, I no longer can perform long criticism.)
posted by Rex at 1:46 PM on September 16, 2008
The financial industry does not need your criticism right now, Rex. BUY BUY BUY!
posted by katiebakes at 2:00 PM on September 16, 2008
NOTE: The commenting window has expired for this post.
Company Tumblr VYou Twitter Google+ Facebook Instagram Flickr Amazon Foursquare
A fimoculous is a micro-organism that consumes its own waste for sustenance.