DAILY LINKS
Twitter shortcuts. Several things in here that I had no idea about.
yesterday
Bing sorta beats Google to real-time Twitter search integration.
yesterday
Ooooo! Anil fires back at Gladwell's criticism of Anderson. See also: Chris Anderson Is Worse Than Wal-Mart. I'm conflicted!
thu
My pals Peter and Ryan have been sorta soft launching GDGT, a social gadget site. Veronica explains it, but best of all, pronounces it (twice, differently). Hopefully this is a sign that smart content people are finally pushing beyond the depressing "launch another blog" strategy that has plagued the increasingly stagnant online publishing world.
thu
Tee: RIP GOP. [via]
wed
I kinda dissed the New York Observer's new site design a while back, but something I've noticed lately is that the homepage currently serves up almost all external links. Even the top story, right now, is currently a link off site. It's the largest attempt to go full-on aggregation since Drudge (contra HuffPo, which is an ingestor, not an aggregator). None of these are in their RSS feed, but I'd subscribe to something that included only those links.
wed
Your least favorite video for the next five minutes: "Alcohol," Millionaires. "Every time I'm at the bar / You wanna pay / Go ahead and buy me a drink / You won't get laid." Oh, you kids.
wed
I actually like the Bing ad campaign (or at least I think they could be somewhat effective), but those new IE8 ads really are a big mistake.
wed
I don't know if I've ever seen anyone so excited with a book as when I ran into Caroline last night toting around an advance copy of Accidental Billionaires. Her review.
wed
Since we're tracking this meme at Fimoc HQ, Texts From Last Night got a book deal.
tue
There's a new YouTube channel, Reporter's Center, where people like Dana Milbank, Michael Isikoff, Bob Woodward, and Arianna Huffington explain how video journalism works.
mon
There's a new video of Leighton Meister on the internet. No, not that video! This one, a video from Cobra Starship [snicker]. The plot is pretty much an episode of Gossip Girl, and except for that breakdown bridge at the end, it's pretty good, right?
mon
I've been thinking a lot about a comment that Rick Webb made in my post last week about unpaid writing gigs. "Just accept it's like photography, and that you'll never make a living off of it." I have a instinctual desire to say, "No, writing is different." But I'm unable to come up with any intelligible way in which it is. Will writing just democratize itself into ubiquity, leaving only a scant few people who can call themselves writers by profession? And would that be a bad thing?
mon
Keeping News of Kidnapping Off Wikipedia: "For seven months, The New York Times managed to keep out of the news the fact that one of its reporters, David Rohde, had been kidnapped by the Taliban. But that was pretty straightforward compared with keeping it off Wikipedia." Wales contributed to the "sanitizing effort," which I'm frankly surprised ever worked. Isn't it surprising that no blogs picked up on this? NPR questions the ethics.
mon
Who thinks Chris Anderson is wrong about the future of free? None other than that other guy whose books you buy at the airport, Malcolm Gladwell!
mon
Fast Company's 4,400-word story on The Kindle is actually worth it, because it wanders into scenarios about how publishing might play out.
sun
Still playing catchup... this news broke last week: David Fincher is possibly directing something called The Social Network, an Aaron Sorkin-written film about the creation of Facebook.
sun
I agree with Bret Easton Ellis a lot, and I have a whole essay (being published this winter! in a book!) about why The Hills is amazing, but I wouldn't go so far as to say it's "the greatest show that I have ever seen in my life."
sun
The One Michael Jackson Article You Have To Read. You know what? Yeah, maybe. See also: What Is Your Favorite Michael Jackson Song? "Billie Jean" is winning in the NYT poll.
sun
Mashable story about SEO Tips for using Twitter. Sigh. Do people really think like this?
sun
My master's alma mater, the University of Washington Digital Media program, is offering a class dedicated to Twitter. They have a blog and a twitter account.
sun

PROJECTS
Stuff I'm Working On:
REAL VS. FAKE
Posted: May 17, 2009

I attended the n+1 panel discussion on the '90s on Friday. I had a question that I wanted to ask, but the q&a was dragging on, and raising my hand felt like a complicated extension of a prolonged My So-Called Life marathon (so good, yet who has the time?). Had I raised my hand, this is what I might have asked:

Nostalgia wasn't always like this, right?

History wasn't always this flat, and everything didn't always seem to happen at once. While we like to point at a decade where "accelerated culture" became normative, nothing actually sped up in the '90s. Everything just ground down to a black hole slacker halt. It was timeless, dude.

Sure, there was that whole internet thing, gnawing at time and space while scrapping our quaint notions of subculture and identity politics. But postmodernism was pimpin, and all of history was being prepped for the pillage. Beavis and Butthead, the Beastie Boys, Jeff Koons, Napster -- these were the princes of pastiche, gobbling up the table scraps the Boomers left behind.

Let me say it more clearly: the '90s invented nostalgia. Or at least nostalgia as we commonly now know it. There was always that anxiety of influence playing its fatherly games, but the '90s morphed anxious fear into an international pastime. The decade obsessed about historicizing itself precisely because history felt as flimsy as the Berlin Wall that had crashed into it. I Love The '70s could not have existed in the '80s, but I Love The '90s could only have existed, instantaneously, in 2000.

This way of thinking -- nostalgia for nostalgia -- now seems commonplace. But it didn't exist in the Reagan '80s or the Wategate '70s. Fukuyama was fugged up enough to see these signs and declare it the end of history (the '00s version of which is the world is flat). He saw the right symptoms, but came up with the wrong diagnosis.

Nostalgic for itself, the '90s were indeed a trap. But never mistake ambivalence for apathy. While the rock gods of yesteryear all perished in accidental pools of vomit, it took an act of will -- a shotgun blast to the head -- to break with the past. Or at least try. It was like that Dostoyevsky Wannabe character in Slacker who asks "Who's ever written a great work about the immense effort required in order not to create?"

And that's why this panel itself seemed yanked out of the past, like that Indiana Jones scene where they find the Ark of the Covenant in a warehouse. The format itself seems tied to the days when the culture wars still mattered and you couldn't Skype your way to Tokyo. I remember panel discussions about "the future" all the time on CNN circa 1995. Now they prop up two bozos to fight out the definition of torture. (Look! Nostalgia for nostalgia!)

Oh yeah, a question? Can we talk about Courtney Love please? Oh well, whatever, nevermind.

See also: Foster | Leon | Bakes.


MEDIA
EVENTS
Events I'm Attending:
FLICKR.COM

From My Photostream »MORE
dammit There's Facebook In My Twitter Stupid Know Your Meme The Discussion Zuki's New Friend: Kiss v. Bite Zuki's New Friend: Play Dead Zuki's New Friend: Fight Club Zuki's New Friend: Cute, Not Cuter Zuki's New Friend: Kiss After Fighting
From My Favorites Photostream »MORE
Pensive Zuks This was fun. Zuks & Doobi Is this a thing? ...speak no evil WebutanteBall09-0886 'Hi, my name is Boxxy'
From My Friends Photostream »MORE
Daisy This is my perfect day Lorika Lipstick Stairs wyoming Hot mess, literally, just out of a 2am sauna session thedancingdotssm There was a lot of food. Bizarre bug found in the kiddie pool Tea Blogging

COLOPHON

Rex Sorgatz

Physical: NYC | Seattle | Minneapolis
Psychological: Facebook | LinkedIn | Twitter
Email: rex@fimoculous.com

What is this? A fimoculous is a micro-organism that consumes its own waste for sustenance. Draw your own metaphors.